USPTO serial 79452132
EPIRAM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 661
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HILL, MARK THOMAS
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 129
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EPIRAM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Patrick Jennings
Patrick Jennings Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman, LLP1200 17th St NWWashington, DC 20036United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Pest control preparations and articles, namely, insect repellents; biocides; agricultural biopesticides; algicides for agricultural use; fungicides; bacterial poisons; insecticides; herbicides; antiparasitic preparations from chemical sources; chemical preparations for pesticidal purposes; chemicals for forestry, namely, parasiticides; insecticides, namely larvicides; preparations for controlling insects, namely insect repellents; preparations for destroying noxious animals; nematicides; ovicides; rodenticides; vermin repelling preparations being vermin destroying preparations; sporicides; vermicides; weedicides being weed killers; domestic biopesticides | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 8, 2026 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 7, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 7, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 7, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 23, 2026 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 23, 2026 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 17, 2026 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 21, 2026 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jul 20, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 25, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 24, 2026 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jun 24, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 18, 2026 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |