USPTO serial 79452826
HELENA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 661
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BULLOFF, TOBY ELLEN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 119
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HELENA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Christina Moser
Christina Moser BakerHostetler127 Public SquareKey Tower, Suite 2000Cleveland, OH 44114Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Lasers for use in military and law enforcement applications; apparatus for wireless energy transmission; optical wireless communications apparatus for data transmission; aerials and antenna for optical wireless communications apparatus; recorded and downloadable software for optical wireless communications services for encrypting and transmitting data; software for design and development of information technology architecture and infrastructure; recorded and downloadable software for design and development of remote sensing technology; recorded and downloadable software for design and development of technology in the field of wireless energy transmission. | ACTIVE | — |
| 013 | Laser directed energy weapons; laser directed energy weapon interception systems comprised of lasers and computer hardware and software; defensive weapon systems employing lasers comprised of lasers and computer hardware and software. | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Optical wireless communication services for transmission of data; telecommunications consultancy and information services relating to optical wireless communications and optical wireless communications equipment. | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Design and development of information technology architecture and infrastructure; research, consultancy and information services in the field of information technology architecture and infrastructure; design and development of remote sensing technology; research, consultancy and information services in the field of remote sensing technology; remote sensing in the fields of airborne and terrestrial [autonomous] navigation, terrain mapping, target tracking, mine hunting and mission planning; design and development of technology in the field of wireless energy transmission; research, technological consultancy and technological information services in the field of wireless energy transmission; research services relating to optical wireless communications and optical wireless communications equipment. | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 8, 2026 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 5, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 5, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 5, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 21, 2026 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 21, 2026 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jul 16, 2026 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jul 15, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 13, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 30, 2026 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 25, 2026 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |