USPTO serial 79452842
HANSHOW NEXMATE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 661
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WOLFSEN, CHRISTIANNE LISBETH
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 129
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HANSHOW NEXMATE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Justin Jingwei Sun
150 S Los Robles Ave, #710PASADENA, CA 91101United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software, recorded, for managing Internet of Things (IoT) devices, robots, electronic shelf labels, product pricing, inventory, order picking, customer traffic data, and out-of-stock conditions in retail stores;computer software platforms, recorded or downloadable, for managing Internet of Things (IoT) devices, robots, electronic shelf labels, and retail store operations, and for integrating third-party applications;mobile phone software applications, downloadable, for collecting shelf information and monitoring shelf conditions in retail stores; data processing apparatus; downloadable operating system programs; recorded operating system programs; interactive touchscreen terminals; telepresence robots; user-programmable humanoid robots, not configured; integrated circuit chips; face recognition equipment , namely, cameras | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Cloud computing featuring software for use in managing Internet of Things (IoT) devices, robots, electronic shelf labels, product pricing, inventory, order picking, customer traffic data, and out-of-stock conditions in retail stores; software as a service (SAAS) featuring software for managing Internet of Things (IoT) devices, robots, electronic shelf labels, product pricing, inventory, order picking, customer traffic data, and out-of-stock conditions in retail stores; artificial intelligence as a service (AIAAS) services featuring software using artificial intelligence for product recognition, customer traffic analysis, shelf monitoring, and out-of-stock detection in retail stores; platform as a service (PAAS) services featuring computer software platforms for managing Internet of Things (IoT) devices and for developing and integrating third-party applications for retail store management; computer software installation and maintenance; development of drive and operating system software; electronic data storage; development of computer platforms; research in the field of artificial intelligence technology; quality control for others | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 13, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 13, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 13, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 8, 2026 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 23, 2026 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 23, 2026 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jul 21, 2026 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jul 20, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 13, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 30, 2026 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 25, 2026 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |