Drawing for HIMAPURE

USPTO serial 79453257

HIMAPURE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 661
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MESSICK, TABITHA LEE
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 104

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HIMAPURE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

M. Scott Alprin

M. Scott Alprin Alprin Law Offices, P.C.5 Pinehurst Circle, N.W.Washington, DC 20015United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030Honey; bee honey; raw honey; herbal honey; natural honey; manuka honey; chancaca honey; edible honeycombs; edible beeswax; caramels; tea; coffee; cocoaACTIVE—
035Retail store and wholesale store services for confectionery; retail store and wholesale store services for tea, coffee and cocoa; retail store and wholesale store services for honey, edible honeycombs, edible beeswax and caramels; import and export agency services for honey, edible honeycombs, edible beeswax, caramels, tea, coffee, cocoa and confectionery.ACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 22, 2026RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 22, 2026CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Oct 17, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 17, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 17, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 8, 2026RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Oct 8, 2026RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Aug 1, 2026RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jul 31, 2026CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 29, 2026DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 10, 2026MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jul 10, 2026NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 2, 2026REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance