USPTO serial 79453508
CALMSCROLLING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 641Office Action
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ADORNO SANTOS, LUZ M.
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111
What this means
The USPTO has issued an Office Action on this application. A response is typically required before the deadline, or the application can be abandoned.
Need help with CALMSCROLLING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Office Action, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Julian D. Forman
Julian D. Forman JD Patent & Trademark Ltd.1055 West Georgia Street, Suite 2400Vancouver, BC, V6E3P3CanadaGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable computer software and mobile applications for bias detection, bias scoring, and content summarization; ai-based analytical tools for assessing and mitigating bias in textual, visual, and multimodal data for content analysis, contextual summarization, and automated editorial decision-support; ai-based tools for evaluating accuracy, neutrality, and tone in digital media; machine-learning models for bias scoring and mitigation; systems for generating and displaying bias-adjusted news summaries; downloadable computer software for bias detection in news articles; downloadable computer software for bias scoring and bias mitigation; downloadable computer software for auditing and detecting bias; downloadable computer software for analyzing and detecting bias; downloadable computer software for ai-bias detection, fairness reporting, and data ethics compliance. | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Software as a service (SaaS) featuring computer software for auditing and detecting bias in publications; software as a service (SaaS) featuring computer software for analyzing and detecting bias in publications; software as a service (SaaS) featuring computer software for AI bias detection, fairness reporting, and data-ethics compliance in publications; providing temporary use of non-downloadable computer software and APIs for bias detection and mitigation in digital advertising, healthcare, education, finance, and other data-driven fields; non-downloadable software for auditing and improving fairness, transparency, and accountability in automated decision systems, including APIs and dashboards for bias analytics and editorial bias visualization; software as a service (SaaS) featuring computer software and APIs for auditing, analyzing, detecting, and mitigating bias in digital content, datasets, algorithms, predictive models, and automated decision-making systems; providing fairness, explainability, transparency, and accountability analytics across text, image, audio, video, and multimodal inputs. | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 9, 2026 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 9, 2026 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Aug 27, 2026 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 4, 2026 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 3, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 23, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 19, 2026 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 19, 2026 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 19, 2026 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jul 19, 2026 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 9, 2026 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 2, 2026 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |