Drawing for NEROS

USPTO serial 79454820

NEROS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 641Office Action
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
COPELAND, ASHTON L
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 111

What this means

The USPTO has issued an Office Action on this application. A response is typically required before the deadline, or the application can be abandoned.

Status 641: Status 641 means the USPTO mailed a non-final Office Action identifying issues with your application. You typically have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.

Need help with NEROS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Office Action, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Camille M. Miller

Camille M. Miller Cozen O'Connor1650 Market Street, Suite 2800Philadelphia, PA 19103United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Ground control station for use with drones consisting of electronic digital displays to view cameras, global positioning systems, and radar images; Electronic devices being ground control stations for use with drones; Electronic devices being ground control stations that enables electronic warfare resistance at range; downloadable software for redirecting data in a wireless network; downloadable software for redirecting data from a wireless device; downloadable application programming interface (API) software for use for communication between the drone and the payload; downloadable application programming interface (API) software for use for communication between the drone and the payload for drone payload integration and deployment; downloadable computer software for integration of the drone with the payload and deployment; electronic and optical communications instruments and components, namely, optical data links; computer software, recorded, for operating drones and unmanned aerial vehicles; computer software, recorded, for drone flight control, navigation, and mission planning; computer software, recorded, for processing, analyzing, and managing data collected by drones; computer hardware for drone operation and control; downloadable mobile applications for drone control and operation; electronic components in the nature of gyroscopes, accelerometers, and magnetometers for drones; electronic flight control systems for drones; cameras for drones; electric sensors for drones; electronic controllers for drones; GPS navigation systems devices for drones; Virtual reality first person view (FPV) goggles; cases for goggles used in connection with drones and unmanned ariel vehicles, electronic transmitters and receivers for drone communicationACTIVE—
012Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) and drones for use by the defense industry; First person view (FPV) drones; drones; structural parts for drones; unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs); commercial drones; military drones; remotely piloted aircraft; aerial vehicles for surveillance, photography, videography, mapping, and inspection purposes; drones that intercept other drones; cases for drones and structural parts of drones; backpacks specially adapted for dronesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (TROA): This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 29, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 27, 2026RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Oct 27, 2026RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Sep 3, 2026NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Aug 27, 2026ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Aug 25, 2026RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Aug 24, 2026CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 27, 2026DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 23, 2026MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jul 23, 2026NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 23, 2026REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance