USPTO serial 79455846
HEAD FUNK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 661
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FINK, GINA M
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HEAD FUNK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John L. Lyon
John L. Lyon Thomas | Horstemeyer LLP3200 Windy Hill Rd SESuite 1600EAtlanta, GA 30339Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Non-medicated hair treatment preparations for cosmetic purposes; cosmetic preparations for hair; soaps for hair and gels for hair; hair conditioners; non-medicated hair balms; hair shampoos; hair spray; non-medicated hair serums; hair mists; hair moisteners in the nature of hair conditioners; hair styling fixatives in the nature of hair wax; hair lotion; hair wax; hair putty in the nature of non-medicated hair balms; hair lacquers; hair bleach; hair colourants; hair dyes; hair mousse; hair gels; hair lighteners; hair creams; hair repair treatments, namely, cosmetic hair care preparations; hair removal and shaving preparations, namely, shaving cream, shaving foam, shaving gel and depilatory creams. | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 12, 2026 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 6, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 6, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 6, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 2, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 27, 2026 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 22, 2026 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Aug 14, 2026 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 13, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 13, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 12, 2026 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Aug 12, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 6, 2026 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |