USPTO serial 79975015
ACTAVIS CREATING VALUE IN PHARMACEUTICALS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3402190Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 25, 2008
- Examiner
- SINGLETON, RUDY
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ACTAVIS CREATING VALUE IN PHARMACEUTICALS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jamie B. Bischoff
Jamie B. Bischoff Ballard Spahr Andrews & Ingersoll, LLP1735 Market Street, 51st FloorPhiladelphia, PA 19103-7599UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Research and development of pharmaceutical products for others; chemical analysis and research for others | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 044 | Advisory and consultancy services in relation to healthcare for others; counseling relating to pharmaceuticals for others | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Actavis Group hf.
- Other trademarks owned by Actavis Group hf.
- Other trademarks owned by Actavis Group
- Other trademarks owned by Actavis Group hf.
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Other trademarks in Class 044
- Similar marks named ACTAVIS CREATING VALUE IN PHARMACEUTICALS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 3, 2013 | RHRD | RESTRICTION OF HOLDER'S RIGHT OF DISPOSAL RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 28, 2013 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2013 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jan 5, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 29, 2012 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 29, 2012 | RHRD | RESTRICTION OF HOLDER'S RIGHT OF DISPOSAL RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 4, 2009 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Apr 16, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 16, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 3, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 3, 2008 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jun 25, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 25, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 8, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 19, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 30, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 29, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 8, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 8, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 10, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 10, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 29, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 8, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 7, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 4, 2007 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 1, 2007 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 18, 2007 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 18, 2007 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 9, 2006 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Oct 23, 2006 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 13, 2006 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 12, 2006 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 6, 2006 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 6, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 7, 2006 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 7, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 2, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 14, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 14, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 15, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 16, 2005 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 26, 2005 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 24, 2005 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 23, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 19, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 19, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Aug 18, 2005 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |