USPTO serial 79975024
ROUGE TOMATE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3329775Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 6, 2007
- Examiner
- BELLO, ZACK
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ROUGE TOMATE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
LE CHÂTEAU DE MA MERE, société anonyme
B-1050 Bruxelles, BE
Other trademarks owned by LE CHÂTEAU DE MA MERE, société anonyme
LE CHÂTEAU DE MA MERE, société anonyme
B-1050 Bruxelles, BE
Other trademarks owned by LE CHÂTEAU DE MA MERE, société anonyme
LE CHÂTEAU DE MA MERE, société anonyme
Bruxelles, BE
Other trademarks owned by LE CHÂTEAU DE MA MERE, société anonyme
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Boris Umansky
Boris Umansky LADAS & PARRY LLP224 S. Michigan Ave., Ste. 1600CHICAGO, IL 60604UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | [ education and training in the nature of health club services, namely, providing instruction in the field of physical exercise; physical fitness instruction; providing facilities for recreation activities; providing various facilities for an array of sporting events, sports and athletic competitions and award programs; sports camps; entertainment services featuring sporting events and sports instruction; sporting and cultural activities, namely, sporting and cultural activities provided in the framework of a sports and leisure club ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 043 | Providing of food and drink for patients and guests; providing temporary accommodation; restaurant and bar services; catering for the provision of food and beverages | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by LE CHÂTEAU DE MA MERE, société anonyme
- Other trademarks owned by LE CHÂTEAU DE MA MERE, société anonyme
- Other trademarks owned by LE CHÂTEAU DE MA MERE, société anonyme
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 043
- Similar marks named ROUGE TOMATE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 11, 2025 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2025 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Feb 28, 2020 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Mar 1, 2019 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 13, 2018 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Mar 6, 2018 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jul 6, 2017 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2017 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 29, 2017 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 2, 2017 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Feb 9, 2015 | IRIV | IRREGULARITY ON INVALIDATION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Feb 5, 2015 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jan 26, 2015 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 26, 2015 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Jul 18, 2014 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Nov 18, 2013 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - MAILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2013 | 71.P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC 71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 18, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 30, 2013 | 71AF | REGISTERED-SEC.71 FILED | — |
| Oct 30, 2013 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 4, 2009 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 12, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 12, 2008 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Feb 6, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 6, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 21, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 1, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 17, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 17, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 12, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 8, 2007 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 7, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 30, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 24, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 7, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 2, 2007 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| May 2, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 2, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 20, 2007 | NAUD | NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - MAILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2007 | NAUD | REPORT UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 13, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 13, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 13, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 5, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 18, 2006 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2006 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 15, 2006 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 12, 2006 | LIMS | LIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED | — |
| Nov 30, 2006 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Nov 9, 2006 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 31, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 30, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 20, 2006 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 13, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 5, 2006 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 5, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 5, 2006 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 29, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 29, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 14, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 14, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 28, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 27, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 7, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 21, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 21, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 2, 2005 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 18, 2005 | IRRF | IRREGULARITY ON REFUSAL FROM IB | — |
| Aug 15, 2005 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 13, 2005 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 12, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 11, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 6, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| May 5, 2005 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |