Drawing for MINERAL EVOLUTION

USPTO serial 79975035

MINERAL EVOLUTION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3423254Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
May 6, 2008
Examiner
BROWNE, DAYNA
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MINERAL EVOLUTION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JOHN ALUMIT

JOHN ALUMIT PATEL & ALUMIT, P.C.16830 VENTURA BLVD.SUITE 360ENCINO, CA 91436

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
018Make up bags sold empty, cosmetic cases sold empty, vanity cases sold empty and toiletry cases sold emptySECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
021Make up accessories, namely, cosmetic brushes, make up brushes, combs and sponges; toilet utensils, namely, soap holders, tooth brush holders, drinking glasses; lotion holders, namely, lotion dispensers; nail brushes and toothbrushesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 21, 2016DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Oct 21, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Oct 16, 2015INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Sep 8, 2015XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Sep 8, 2015XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Aug 12, 2015INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Dec 12, 2014C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Feb 11, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 10, 2010RINXUSPTO CORRECTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 18, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Aug 7, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 6, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Feb 19, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 30, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 24, 2008OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 15, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 15, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 10, 2008OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jan 10, 2008OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 30, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 30, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Nov 30, 2007GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 30, 2007GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 30, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Nov 13, 2007DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Nov 1, 2007DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Nov 1, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 24, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 24, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 24, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 7, 2007GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jun 7, 2007GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 7, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 14, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 14, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 14, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 19, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 12, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 12, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 22, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 21, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 21, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 21, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 13, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 25, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Sep 25, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Sep 21, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Sep 20, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 20, 2006RFWRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW—
Sep 17, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Sep 16, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 7, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 11, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Aug 10, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance