USPTO serial 79975048
PETKEG
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VENGROFF, MARILYN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PETKEG?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Machines for the beverage industry, namely, for cleaning, filling and closing of kegs and machines and installations used for keg transport and palletizing, namely, power operated lifts used to transport and place portable storage containers; machines and installations that produce kegs consisting of synthetic material through the stretch-blow molding process; machines and installations for filling such kegs with a liquid product; and machines and installations for labeling and packing such kegs | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 4, 2008 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Dec 4, 2008 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2008 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 23, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 21, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 5, 2008 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 2, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 28, 2008 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 28, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 28, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 24, 2008 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 20, 2008 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Mar 20, 2008 | LIEC | LEGAL INSTRUMENT EXAMINER (LIE) - CORRECTION | — |
| Mar 20, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 20, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 20, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 10, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 16, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 26, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 26, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Oct 26, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Oct 25, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 12, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 12, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Oct 11, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |