USPTO serial 79975049
ROUGE TOMATE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BELLO, ZACK
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - DOCKET CLERK
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ROUGE TOMATE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Frederick W. Meyers
TANYA MIARI LADAS & PARRY, LLP224 SOUTH MICHIGAN AVENUESUITE 1600CHICAGO, IL 60604Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | Beers, mineral and aerated waters and other non-alcoholic beverages, namely, soda pops, soft drinks, sports drinks, vegetable juices beverages, energy drinks, herbal juices; fruit drinks and fruit juices; syrups and other preparations for making non-alcoholic beverages, namely, fruit juices | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 11, 2025 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Feb 28, 2020 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Mar 1, 2019 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 13, 2018 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jun 2, 2017 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Feb 5, 2015 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Mar 27, 2012 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 6, 2012 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 3, 2012 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 3, 2011 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 3, 2011 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 29, 2010 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 16, 2010 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| May 18, 2010 | RBFT | REPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES | — |
| Apr 7, 2010 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 12, 2010 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2010 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 10, 2009 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 14, 2009 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2009 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 3, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 3, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 29, 2009 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 29, 2009 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 29, 2009 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 29, 2009 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 29, 2009 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2009 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 10, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 9, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 9, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 10, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 10, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 8, 2008 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 27, 2008 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Jun 16, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 16, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 16, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 27, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 27, 2008 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 23, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 23, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 22, 2008 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| May 22, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 19, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 19, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 16, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 26, 2007 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Nov 23, 2007 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 8, 2007 | PCGR | PETITION TO DIRECTOR GRANTED | — |
| Aug 2, 2007 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jun 29, 2007 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jun 29, 2007 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 8, 2007 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 7, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 30, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 24, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 7, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 2, 2007 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| May 2, 2007 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| May 2, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 2, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 20, 2007 | NAUD | NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - MAILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2007 | NAUD | REPORT UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 13, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 13, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 13, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 5, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 18, 2006 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2006 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 15, 2006 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 12, 2006 | LIMS | LIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED | — |
| Nov 30, 2006 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Nov 9, 2006 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 31, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 30, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 20, 2006 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 13, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 5, 2006 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 5, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 5, 2006 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 29, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 29, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 14, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 14, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 28, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 27, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 7, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 21, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 21, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 2, 2005 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 18, 2005 | IRRF | IRREGULARITY ON REFUSAL FROM IB | — |
| Aug 15, 2005 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 13, 2005 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 12, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 11, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 6, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| May 5, 2005 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |