USPTO serial 79975103
ELETTROBAY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 5019959Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 16, 2016
- Examiner
- CASSIDY, COLLEEN MULCRONE
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ELETTROBAY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
ACM S.A.S. DI ESTER ZAPPULLA E C.
LAZISE (VR), IT
ACM S.A.S. DI ESTER ZAPPULLA E C.
LAZISE (VR), IT
ACM S.A.S. DI ESTER ZAPPULLA E C.
LAZISE (VR), IT
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Advertising; business management; business administration; providing office functions | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 038 | Telecommunications consultation, telecommunications access services, telecommunications gateway services, services of communication via analogue and digital computer terminals, services of communication in the nature of transmission and distribution of data or audio visual images via a global computer network or the Internet, providing users access to portals on the Internet | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ACM S.A.S. DI ESTER ZAPPULLA E C.
- Other trademarks owned by ACM S.A.S. DI ESTER ZAPPULLA E C.
- Other trademarks owned by ACM S.A.S. DI ESTER ZAPPULLA E C.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Similar marks named ELETTROBAY
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 11, 2025 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Nov 3, 2023 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Mar 3, 2023 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Jul 8, 2017 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 9, 2017 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 9, 2017 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 16, 2016 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 16, 2016 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 1, 2016 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 1, 2016 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 31, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 18, 2016 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 18, 2016 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 11, 2016 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 11, 2016 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 11, 2016 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 29, 2016 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Mar 14, 2016 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 1, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 8, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 8, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 8, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 23, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 23, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 28, 2015 | MNDA | NOTICE OF DIVIDED TRADEMARK APPLICATION MAILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2015 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 24, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 24, 2015 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 21, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 21, 2015 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 20, 2015 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 20, 2015 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 26, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 31, 2015 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 30, 2015 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 30, 2015 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 16, 2015 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 12, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 12, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 12, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 5, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 8, 2015 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 20, 2014 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2014 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 19, 2014 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 18, 2014 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 17, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 16, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 16, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 11, 2014 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |