USPTO serial 79975112
HOPPOP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HABEEB, MYRIAH A
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HOPPOP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Julia Gard
JULIA GARD BARNES & THORNBURG, LLP11 S MERIDIAN STINDIANAPOLIS, IN 46204-3506UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | children's car seats | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 018 | Diaper bags and combination diaper bag/booster seats sold together as one unit | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 020 | Children's seats, booster seats, baby high chairs, baby relax seats and baby seats not for use in vehicles | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by BABY ART bvba,; VERLINDEN Christophe
- Other trademarks owned by Baby Art BVBA
- Other trademarks owned by Baby Art BVBA
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Other trademarks in Class 018
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Similar marks named HOPPOP
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 12, 2018 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 11, 2018 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jan 26, 2018 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Dec 18, 2011 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 21, 2011 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 21, 2011 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 21, 2010 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 21, 2010 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 4, 2010 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 23, 2010 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 8, 2010 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 8, 2010 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 8, 2010 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 23, 2010 | MNDA | NOTICE OF DIVIDED TRADEMARK APPLICATION MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 18, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 18, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 18, 2010 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 18, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 26, 2010 | MREI | NOTICE OF REINSTATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2010 | ATRQ | ATTORNEY REVIEW/DECISION ON AMENDMENT REQUIRED | — |
| Jan 14, 2010 | PCGR | PETITION TO DIRECTOR GRANTED | — |
| Jan 11, 2010 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Dec 1, 2009 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Nov 6, 2009 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 6, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 15, 2009 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Sep 26, 2009 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Sep 18, 2009 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 4, 2009 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Sep 4, 2009 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Aug 18, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 18, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 17, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 22, 2009 | UNTD | REQUEST TO DIVIDE UNTIMELY, REFUSED, OR WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jul 22, 2009 | NAUD | NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - MAILED | — |
| Jul 21, 2009 | NAUD | REPORT UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| May 21, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 21, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 18, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 14, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 14, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 14, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 13, 2009 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| May 13, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 13, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 13, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 8, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 8, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 20, 2008 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 17, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 17, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Nov 15, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 14, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 11, 2008 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 7, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Nov 6, 2008 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |