USPTO serial 79975174
STRADIVARIUS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DELGIZZI, RONALD ERNEST
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with STRADIVARIUS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
E-15142 ARTEIXO (A Coruña), ES
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | soaps for personal use; essential oils, cosmetics, hair lotions; dentifrices; shaving products, namely, shaving balms, shaving creams, shaving foams, shaving gels, shaving lotions, shaving mousses, shaving soaps and shaving preparations in the nature of non-medicated creams; cotton buds for cosmetic purposes; beauty masks; cosmetic sun-tanning preparations; cosmetic skin care preparations; hair colouring and dyes; polish and cream for footwear; waxes, namely, wax for removing body hair and paraffin waxes for cosmetic purposes; shampoos; cosmetic kits comprised of primarily cosmetics; depilatories; make-up remover; lipstick; cosmetic pencils; hair and nail sprays; lacquer-removing preparations fo, 24, 25, r nails; tissues impregnated with cosmetic lotions; aftershave lotions; lotions for cosmetic purposes; make-up preparations; cosmetic pomades; nail care preparations; cobblers' wax; bleaching preparations for cosmetic purposes; decorative transfers for cosmetic purposes; false nails and eyelashes; pumice stone for personal use; cosmetic preparations for slimming purposes; cosmetic bath preparations, namely, bath oils, bath lotions; hair waving preparations; non-medicated toiletries; non-medicated mouth care preparations; bath salts, not for medical purposes; hygienic products for cleaning purposes, namely, shower gels, shampoos and shampoos-conditioners; oils for toiletry purposes; sunscreen lotions and creams; deodorant soaps; talcum powder | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Aug 14, 2015 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 14, 2012 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 16, 2012 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 16, 2012 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 16, 2011 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 16, 2011 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 16, 2011 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 30, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 30, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 5, 2011 | MNDA | NOTICE OF DIVIDED TRADEMARK APPLICATION MAILED | — |
| Mar 1, 2011 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 25, 2011 | MREI | NOTICE OF REINSTATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 23, 2011 | RGIA | REINSTATEMENT GRANTED - INADVERTENTLY ABANDONED | — |
| Feb 23, 2011 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 21, 2011 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 21, 2011 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 21, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 21, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 21, 2011 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 21, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 20, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 11, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 11, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 2, 2009 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 2, 2009 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 20, 2009 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 5, 2009 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 5, 2009 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 2, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 2, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 30, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 30, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 29, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 29, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 28, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 28, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 16, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 26, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 25, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Oct 25, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Oct 24, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 24, 2007 | RFWR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW | — |
| Oct 24, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Oct 23, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 28, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 28, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Sep 27, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |