USPTO serial 79975216
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stephen B. Mosier
Stephen B. Mosier HAYES SOLOWAY PC4640 E. Skyline DriveTucson, AZ 85718UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 031 | foodstuff for animals, excluding dog food | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 5, 2026 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 5, 2026 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Aug 8, 2022 | FINP | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 11, 2018 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 21, 2018 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 21, 2018 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 14, 2017 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 14, 2017 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 29, 2017 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 29, 2017 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 21, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 21, 2017 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 15, 2016 | RDX3 | NOTIFICATION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2016 | RDX1 | ACTION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2016 | RRDX | ACTION REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED COUNTED NOT MAILED | — |
| Jul 28, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 27, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 27, 2016 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 24, 2016 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jun 24, 2016 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 24, 2016 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 23, 2016 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jun 18, 2016 | MNDA | NOTICE OF DIVIDED TRADEMARK APPLICATION MAILED | — |
| Jun 14, 2016 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 14, 2016 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| May 28, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 27, 2016 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| May 27, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 27, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 27, 2016 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 18, 2015 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 1, 2015 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 1, 2015 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Nov 26, 2015 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 25, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 23, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 10, 2015 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 29, 2015 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |