Drawing for LUVE

USPTO serial 79975216

LUVE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BRACEY, KAREN
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LUVE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Stephen B. Mosier

Stephen B. Mosier HAYES SOLOWAY PC4640 E. Skyline DriveTucson, AZ 85718UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
031foodstuff for animals, excluding dog foodSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 5, 2026DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Mar 5, 2026DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Aug 8, 2022FINPFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
May 11, 2018FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 21, 2018FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Mar 21, 2018FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 14, 2017OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 14, 2017OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 29, 2017OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Mar 29, 2017OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 21, 2017MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 21, 2017ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 15, 2016RDX3NOTIFICATION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED—
Aug 15, 2016RDX1ACTION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED E-MAILED—
Aug 15, 2016RRDXACTION REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED COUNTED NOT MAILED—
Jul 28, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 27, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 27, 2016ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jun 24, 2016GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jun 24, 2016GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 24, 2016CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 23, 2016LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jun 18, 2016MNDANOTICE OF DIVIDED TRADEMARK APPLICATION MAILED—
Jun 14, 2016DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jun 14, 2016AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
May 28, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 27, 2016DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
May 27, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 27, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 27, 2016ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Dec 18, 2015RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 1, 2015RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Dec 1, 2015RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Nov 26, 2015RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Nov 25, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 23, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 10, 2015MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Nov 5, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 29, 2015REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance