USPTO serial 79975236
ACCESSION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- OLANDRIA, WARREN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ACCESSION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kevin Oliveira
Kevin Oliveira ODIN, FELDMAN & PITTLEMAN, PC1775 WIEHLE AVENUE, SUITE 400RESTON, VA 20190-5159UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | business planning; business management; business administration; public relations; business development | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 18, 2022 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Mar 14, 2022 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 4, 2015 | IRFI | IRREGULARITY ON FINAL DECISION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Mar 24, 2015 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 24, 2015 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 6, 2015 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 13, 2015 | FISN | FINAL DECISION PROCESSED AND SENT TO IB | — |
| May 1, 2014 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 16, 2014 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 16, 2014 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 24, 2014 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 24, 2014 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 8, 2013 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 26, 2013 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 26, 2013 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 3, 2013 | MNDA | NOTICE OF DIVIDED TRADEMARK APPLICATION MAILED | — |
| Jul 30, 2013 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 22, 2013 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 5, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 5, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 29, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 23, 2013 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| May 23, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 23, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 23, 2013 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 22, 2013 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 22, 2013 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 23, 2012 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 4, 2012 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2012 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 3, 2012 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 1, 2012 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 30, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 28, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 28, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 16, 2012 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |