USPTO serial 79975286
NOWHERE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MARTIN, CHRISTINE C
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with NOWHERE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael J. Leonard
Michael J. Leonard Fox Rothschild LLP997 Lenox Drive, Building 3Lawrenceville, NJ 08648-2311UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Clothing, namely, shirts, jackets, sweatshirts, coats, trousers, footwear, headgear, namely hats and caps | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 28, 2023 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Apr 16, 2022 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| May 10, 2021 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 27, 2021 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Oct 13, 2014 | IRFI | IRREGULARITY ON FINAL DECISION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Sep 17, 2014 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 17, 2014 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 24, 2013 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 4, 2013 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 4, 2013 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 17, 2013 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 17, 2013 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 25, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 29, 2013 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 6, 2013 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2013 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 6, 2013 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 29, 2013 | MNDA | NOTICE OF DIVIDED TRADEMARK APPLICATION MAILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2013 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 22, 2013 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 8, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 7, 2013 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 7, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 7, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 7, 2013 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 28, 2012 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 6, 2012 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 6, 2012 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jul 6, 2012 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jul 5, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 4, 2012 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 30, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 28, 2012 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |