USPTO serial 79975309
SEAGUAR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 5193296Status 706Renewal
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 1, 2007
- Examiner
- RADEMACHER, MARK A
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with SEAGUAR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $299*
Plus Government fees of $650
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey B. Sladkus, Esq.
Jeffrey B. Sladkus, Esq. The Sladkus Law Group1827 Powers Ferry RoadBuilding 6, Suite 200Atlanta, GA 30339Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | Fishing tackle; fishing lines | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 1, 2026 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 18, 2025 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Dec 11, 2025 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Nov 7, 2025 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 7, 2025 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Dec 13, 2017 | INNA | INVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE | — |
| Dec 6, 2017 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jun 17, 2017 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2017 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 28, 2017 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 18, 2017 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Apr 11, 2017 | MNDA | NOTICE OF DIVIDED TRADEMARK APPLICATION MAILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2017 | PRAM | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 7 | — |
| Apr 6, 2017 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 6, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 1, 2016 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 3, 2016 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Feb 25, 2016 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 25, 2016 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Nov 20, 2014 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 22, 2013 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2013 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Oct 2, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 30, 2013 | 715F | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2013 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 19, 2013 | A7OK | AMENDMENT UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Aug 23, 2013 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 11, 2013 | PRAM | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 7 | — |
| May 28, 2013 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| May 16, 2013 | PRAM | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 7 | — |
| May 4, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 23, 2013 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2013 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 1, 2008 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 6, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 6, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 19, 2007 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 16, 2007 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 3, 2007 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 1, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 13, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 24, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 14, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 14, 2006 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Dec 14, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 12, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 29, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 13, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 9, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 9, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 22, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 5, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 5, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jun 2, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 1, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 1, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 25, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Apr 20, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |