USPTO serial 79975335
HELLOWORLD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HOWARD, PARKER WALDRIP
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with HELLOWORLD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Anthony Misquitta
Anthony Misquitta Keystone Law48 Chancery LaneLondon, WC2A1JFUNITED KINGDOMGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Entertainment services, namely, conception, creation, production, and presentation of live music, dramatic, comedy, spoken word, sporting, competitions, dance, bicycle, skateboard, roller skate, gymnastics, cooking, stunt, powered vehicle, non powered vehicle, sports, and gaming performances; conception, creation, production, distribution and presentation of audio visual works, namely, motion pictures, television shows, multimedia entertainment content; production of multimedia performances; entertainment services, namely, arranging and conducting special events for social entertainment purposes, namely, discotheques, night clubs, music festivals, music concerts; distribution of television programs, films and audio recordings; production of television programs, films and audio recordings, webcasts, podcasts and photography | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 25, 2020 | IRRH | IRREGULARITY FROM IB EXAMINED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 23, 2020 | IRFI | IRREGULARITY ON FINAL DECISION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Feb 21, 2020 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 21, 2020 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 31, 2019 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 4, 2019 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 4, 2019 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 21, 2019 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Feb 21, 2019 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Feb 21, 2019 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 21, 2019 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 29, 2018 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 29, 2018 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 29, 2018 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 14, 2018 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 14, 2018 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 27, 2018 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 3, 2018 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 2, 2018 | OPNS | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 31, 2018 | OPNC | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED | — |
| Oct 27, 2017 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 3, 2017 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2017 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 29, 2017 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 13, 2017 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 13, 2017 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 13, 2017 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 18, 2017 | MNDA | NOTICE OF DIVIDED TRADEMARK APPLICATION MAILED | — |
| Aug 14, 2017 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 7, 2017 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 28, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 27, 2017 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 27, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 27, 2017 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 27, 2017 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| May 17, 2017 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 17, 2017 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 18, 2017 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 16, 2017 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 15, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 4, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 3, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 3, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 25, 2017 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 25, 2017 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jan 21, 2017 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jan 21, 2017 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jan 20, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 17, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 17, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 12, 2017 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |