USPTO serial 79975385
VENTURI GRAND PRIX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CROWLEY, SEAN MICHAEL
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VENTURI GRAND PRIX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Nicholas D Wells
Nicholas D Wells Legends Law Group, PLLC330 N. Main St.Kaysville, UT 84037UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Apparatus and instruments for conducting, switching, transforming, accumulating, regulating or controlling electricity, namely, electrical transformers; apparatus for recording, transmission or reproduction of sound or images; software, namely, battery management systems, software for human-machine-interface (HMI) software, software for cooling system controls, software for managing peripherals and computer accessories; batteries | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 014 | Jewelry products, namely, watches, timepieces and chronometric instruments | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 025 | Clothing, footwear, headgear, namely, tops, bottoms, footwear, hats, race suits, gloves, helmets | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Scientific and technological services and research and design relating thereto, namely, engineering services; industrial analysis and research services, namely, engineering services; design and development of computers and software | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 3, 2024 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 3, 2024 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Dec 10, 2019 | IRRH | IRREGULARITY FROM IB EXAMINED BY MPU | — |
| Oct 7, 2019 | IRFI | IRREGULARITY ON FINAL DECISION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Sep 16, 2019 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 14, 2019 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 5, 2019 | FINP | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 23, 2018 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 14, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 14, 2018 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 30, 2018 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 30, 2018 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 8, 2018 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 8, 2018 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 1, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 28, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 20, 2018 | MNDA | NOTICE OF DIVIDED TRADEMARK APPLICATION MAILED | — |
| Feb 16, 2018 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 12, 2018 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 31, 2018 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 31, 2018 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 9, 2018 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 28, 2017 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 28, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 13, 2016 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 24, 2016 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 18, 2016 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 2, 2016 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 2, 2016 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 24, 2015 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 18, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 11, 2015 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 11, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 14, 2015 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 13, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 13, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 13, 2015 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 13, 2015 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 24, 2014 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 9, 2014 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 9, 2014 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Oct 9, 2014 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Oct 8, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 7, 2014 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 3, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 2, 2014 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |