USPTO serial 79975395
UNITI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SCHIMPF, TIMOTHY O
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 130 - SENIOR ATTORNEY
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with UNITI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ben Natter
Ben Natter Haug Partners, LLP745 Fifth AvenueNew York, NY 10151UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | Lightweight and energy efficient electric city cars featuring long range and high speed travel capabilities and a technology focused user experience | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 27, 2022 | IRRH | IRREGULARITY FROM IB EXAMINED BY MPU | — |
| Oct 18, 2022 | IRFI | IRREGULARITY ON FINAL DECISION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Oct 5, 2022 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 5, 2022 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 5, 2021 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 5, 2021 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 27, 2021 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 27, 2021 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 18, 2021 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Jul 31, 2021 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 3, 2021 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2021 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2021 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| May 21, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 21, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 18, 2021 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 17, 2021 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| May 17, 2021 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 17, 2021 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 17, 2021 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 9, 2021 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 19, 2020 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Nov 19, 2020 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 19, 2020 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 5, 2020 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 5, 2020 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2020 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2020 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 14, 2020 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 16, 2019 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 18, 2019 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 1, 2019 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 1, 2019 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 13, 2019 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 13, 2019 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 29, 2018 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 19, 2018 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 24, 2018 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 24, 2018 | MNDA | NOTICE OF DIVIDED TRADEMARK APPLICATION MAILED | — |
| Apr 22, 2018 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 22, 2018 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 20, 2018 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 20, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 20, 2018 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 9, 2018 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 6, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 6, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 4, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 22, 2018 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 22, 2018 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 22, 2018 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 22, 2018 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 22, 2018 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 14, 2017 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 7, 2017 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 20, 2017 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 20, 2017 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 16, 2017 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 15, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 12, 2017 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 8, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 7, 2017 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |