Drawing for OLD HARBOR

USPTO serial 79975446

OLD HARBOR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BLANDU, FLORENTINA
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with OLD HARBOR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

ALEXANDER LAZOUSKI

ALEXANDER LAZOUSKI LAZOUSKI IP LLC14726 BOWFIN TERRACESUITE 1LAKEWOOD RANCH, FL 34202

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030Tea, cocoa, sugar, rice, tapioca, sago, flour and preparations made from cereals, bread, pastry and confectionery, ices; honey, treacle; yeast, baking powder; salt, mustard; vinegar, sauces condiments; spicesABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 20, 2023FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 31, 2023FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jan 31, 2023FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 1, 2022MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Jan 31, 2022ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Jan 31, 2022OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Nov 15, 2021OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Aug 31, 2021OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Dec 27, 2019OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 27, 2019OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 11, 2019OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Dec 11, 2019OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 13, 2019RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 21, 2019OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Aug 15, 2019OPNSOPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB—
Aug 15, 2019OPNCOPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED—
May 15, 2019ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Apr 16, 2019NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Apr 16, 2019PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 12, 2019GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 27, 2019OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Mar 27, 2019NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Mar 27, 2019OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 12, 2019MNDANOTICE OF DIVIDED TRADEMARK APPLICATION MAILED—
Mar 9, 2019CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 8, 2019DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Feb 22, 2019AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jan 10, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 9, 2019DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Jan 9, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 9, 2019TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 9, 2019ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Dec 3, 2018ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 3, 2018REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Aug 18, 2018RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 30, 2018RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jul 30, 2018RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jul 16, 2018RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jul 15, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 11, 2018MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jul 7, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 7, 2018NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 5, 2018REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance