USPTO serial 79975477
CRSC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 622
- Filing date
- —
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- UNKNOWN
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CRSC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Julianne Abelman
Julianne Abelman Abelman Frayne & Schwab666 3rd Avenue10th FloorNew York, NY 10017Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Technical research in the field of architectural design, civil engineering; conducting technical project studies in the nature of providing scientific research in the field of metallurgy; engineering; physics research; mechanical research; research and development of new products for others; consultancy in the field of energy-saving, namely, consulting services in the field of energy measurement to improve energy efficiency; scientific research; technological consultancy; telecommunications technology consultancy; technical writing; engineering drafting services, namely, engineering design services; geological surveys; land surveying; geological prospecting; geological research; calibration services; surveying; industrial design; architectural services; architectural consultancy; construction drafting; design of building construction projects, namely, architectural design; computer programming; computer software design; updating of computer software; consultancy in the design and development of computer hardware; recovery of computer data; rental of computer software; maintenance of computer software; computer system analysis; computer system design; duplication of computer programs; conversion of data or documents from physical to electronic media; installation of computer software; data conversion of computer programs and data, other than physical conversion; computer software consultancy; monitoring of computer systems by remote access to ensure proper functioning; software as a service (SaaS) services featuring software for use in monitoring the location of locomotives on railways; information technology (IT) consultancy; server hosting; off-site data backup; cloud computing featuring software for use in monitoring the location of locomotives on railways; electronic data storage; computer technology consultancy; computer security consultancy | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 1, 2020 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 1, 2020 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 17, 2019 | MNDA | NOTICE OF DIVIDED TRADEMARK APPLICATION MAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2019 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 22, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 21, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 21, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 21, 2019 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 16, 2019 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 22, 2019 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 22, 2019 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Feb 13, 2019 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 12, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 9, 2019 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 5, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 31, 2019 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |