Drawing for AIWA

USPTO serial 79975481

AIWA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MISCHLER, MEGAN
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 127 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AIWA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Deborah L. Shapiro

Deborah L. Shapiro MOSES & SINGER LLPThe Chrysler Building405 Lexington AvenueNew York, NY 10174

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
037Maintenance and repair of computer hardware; maintenance and repair of telephones; maintenance and repair of radios or television apparatus; maintenance and repair of electric appliances; maintenance and repair of lighting apparatus; maintenance and repair of power distribution machines and apparatusSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 18, 2020DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Jul 17, 2020DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jun 19, 2020RFNPREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 18, 2020RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 24, 2020GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 18, 2019GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 18, 2019GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 18, 2019CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Dec 17, 2019DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Dec 17, 2019AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Dec 7, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 6, 2019DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Dec 6, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 6, 2019TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 6, 2019ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Nov 18, 2019GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 18, 2019GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 18, 2019CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 5, 2019XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Nov 5, 2019GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 5, 2019GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 5, 2019CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Nov 5, 2019MNDANOTICE OF DIVIDED TRADEMARK APPLICATION MAILED—
Nov 1, 2019DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Nov 1, 2019AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Oct 31, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 30, 2019DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Oct 30, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 30, 2019TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 30, 2019ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Oct 29, 2019ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 29, 2019REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jun 8, 2019RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
May 23, 2019RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
May 23, 2019RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Apr 30, 2019RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Apr 30, 2019MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Apr 29, 2019CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 25, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 25, 2019NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 18, 2019REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance