USPTO serial 79975488
AIWA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MISCHLER, MEGAN
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with AIWA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Deborah L. Shapiro
DEBORAH L SHAPIRO MOSES & SINGER LLPTHE CHRYSLER BUILDING405 LEXINGTON AVENUENEW YORK, NY 10174Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | Hot air blower; fans for air conditioning apparatus; air cooling apparatus; air filtering installations; electric air deodorizing apparatus; filters for air conditioning; electric air dryers; heat generators; gas stoves; hot water heating installations; ionization apparatus for the treatment of air or water; heating installations; air-conditioning apparatus; air sterilizers; electric footwarmers in the nature of footmuffs; refrigerating cabinets; refrigerators; refrigerating box; wine cellars, electric; desiccating apparatus for dying clothes and dishes; hair dryers; facial saunas; filters for drinking water; water purifying apparatus and machines; LED light fixtures; ceiling lights; electric torches for lighting; electric lighting fixtures; light bulbs; electric lamps; electrically heated carpets; blankets, electric, not for medical purposes; electric toaster ovens; microwave ovens; coffee percolators, electric; kettles, electric; coffee machines, electric; electric cooking pots; bread baking machines; electric barbecue grills; hot plates | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 28, 2020 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 28, 2020 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 18, 2020 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2020 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jun 19, 2020 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 29, 2020 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 27, 2020 | OPNS | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB | — |
| May 27, 2020 | OPNC | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED | — |
| Feb 7, 2020 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 28, 2020 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2020 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 24, 2020 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 8, 2020 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 8, 2020 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 8, 2020 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 21, 2019 | MNDA | NOTICE OF DIVIDED TRADEMARK APPLICATION MAILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 18, 2019 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 17, 2019 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 17, 2019 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 7, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 6, 2019 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 6, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 6, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 6, 2019 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 18, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 18, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 18, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 5, 2019 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 5, 2019 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2019 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2019 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 5, 2019 | MNDA | NOTICE OF DIVIDED TRADEMARK APPLICATION MAILED | — |
| Nov 1, 2019 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 1, 2019 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 31, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 30, 2019 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 30, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 30, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 30, 2019 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 29, 2019 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 29, 2019 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 8, 2019 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 23, 2019 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| May 23, 2019 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Apr 30, 2019 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Apr 30, 2019 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Apr 29, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 25, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 25, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 18, 2019 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |