USPTO serial 79975495
30
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LAPTER, ALAIN J
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with 30?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
RUSSELL C PANGBORN
RUSSELL C PANGBORN SEED IP LAW GROUP LLP701 FIFTH AVENUE, SUITE 5400SEATTLE, WA 98104UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Design of computer game software; development of computer game software; programming of multimedia applications; hosting of multimedia applications on the Internet for use by others for providing fitness routines and tracking physical fitness goals; hosting of interactive applications on the Internet for use by others for providing fitness routines and tracking physical fitness goals; hosting of mobile applications on the Internet for use by others for providing fitness routines and tracking physical fitness goals; hosting of computerized data, files, applications and information on the Internet; advice and consultancy in relation to computer networking applications; consulting in the field of cloud computing networks and applications; providing temporary use of web-based applications for providing fitness routines and tracking physical fitness goals; advisory services relating to planning applications, namely, computer software consultancy; computer and mobile software design services; computer software design; computer system design services; design of computer hardware; website design; IT computer programming services; on-line computer design and development services; software development; software design and development; video game software development; research and development of computer software; computer software development for others; development of virtual reality software; software development, programming and implementation; design and development of software in the field of mobile applications | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 23, 2024 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jan 23, 2024 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 20, 2022 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 26, 2022 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 26, 2022 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 15, 2022 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 26, 2021 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jan 26, 2021 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jan 26, 2021 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 26, 2021 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 19, 2020 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 19, 2020 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 2, 2020 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 2, 2020 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 22, 2020 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 7, 2020 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 7, 2020 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Apr 30, 2020 | OPNS | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 30, 2020 | OPNC | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED | — |
| Mar 31, 2020 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 31, 2020 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2020 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 27, 2020 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 11, 2020 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 11, 2020 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 11, 2020 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2020 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 18, 2020 | MNDA | NOTICE OF DIVIDED TRADEMARK APPLICATION MAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2020 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 13, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 13, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 13, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 12, 2020 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 11, 2020 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 30, 2020 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 30, 2020 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 8, 2020 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 8, 2020 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 17, 2019 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 17, 2019 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 30, 2019 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 14, 2019 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 14, 2019 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jul 29, 2019 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jul 28, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 27, 2019 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 23, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 27, 2019 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |