USPTO serial 79975550
LEITZ
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 6171771Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 5, 2013
- Examiner
- MARTIN, EUGENIA K
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with LEITZ?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Leica Microsystems Holdings GmbH
DE
Leica Microsystems Holdings GmbH
DE
Wetzlar, DE
Leica Microsystems Holdings GmbH
Salzburg, DE
AT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Marcus Luepke
Marcus Luepke Muncy, Geissler, Olds & Lowe, P.C.125 S. Royal St.Alexandria, VA 22314UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Presentation of multimedia presentations, training sessions and training presentations in the field of precision engineered devices and systems; Publication of printed matters and online documents featuring information and scientific communications relating to application engineering and product application in the field of precision engineered devices and systems | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Leica Microsystems Holdings GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Leica Microsystems Holdings GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Leica Camera AG
- Other trademarks owned by Leica Microsystems Holdings GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by AHK Vermögensverwaltung GmbH
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named LEITZ
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 5, 2026 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Sep 9, 2023 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2023 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 28, 2023 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 6, 2023 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 4, 2022 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE - INFORMATION MADE OF RECORD | — |
| Jul 23, 2022 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 27, 2022 | CORN | CORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| May 23, 2022 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Feb 5, 2022 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 20, 2022 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Mar 15, 2021 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 22, 2020 | MNDA | NOTICE OF DIVIDED TRADEMARK APPLICATION MAILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2020 | LIME | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED AND ENTERED | — |
| Sep 16, 2020 | PRAM | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 7 | — |
| Sep 16, 2020 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 16, 2020 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 31, 2019 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 31, 2019 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Feb 11, 2019 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - MAILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2019 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Feb 8, 2019 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 29, 2019 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 29, 2019 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 17, 2018 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 17, 2018 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 28, 2017 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 3, 2016 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Oct 7, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 17, 2013 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 17, 2013 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| May 5, 2013 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 11, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 5, 2013 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 29, 2012 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 20, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 31, 2012 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 31, 2012 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 31, 2012 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 18, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 18, 2012 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 18, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 18, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2012 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 17, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 17, 2012 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 4, 2012 | RMDT | EXAMINERS REQUEST FOR REMAND TO TTAB | — |
| Aug 22, 2012 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2012 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 12, 2012 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 12, 2012 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 12, 2012 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 7, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 7, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 7, 2012 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 13, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 12, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 23, 2011 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 20, 2011 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 16, 2010 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 15, 2010 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 8, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 13, 2009 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 12, 2009 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 10, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 9, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 9, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 9, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 9, 2008 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 24, 2008 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 24, 2008 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 14, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 9, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 9, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 14, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 14, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 14, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 30, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 22, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 1, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 1, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Nov 29, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 28, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 27, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 27, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Nov 23, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |