USPTO serial 79975551
GYMBOX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 6171772Status 709
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 10, 2014
- Examiner
- EULIN, INGRID C
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GYMBOX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Purvi J. Patel
Purvi J. Patel Haynes and Boone, LLP2323 Victory Ave., Suite 700Dallas, TX 75219UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Providing sports facilities; providing sport camps; lesson demonstration with practical exercises, namely, physical fitness instruction; services of a health and fitness club, namely, providing instruction and equipment in the field of physical exercise, teaching in the field of physical education, exercise, fitness information; providing education in the field of physical education, exercise, fitness information rendered through correspondence courses; gymnastic instruction; arranging and conducting of educational congresses in the field of physical education, exercise, fitness information; arranging and conducting of cultural and physical education, fitness and aerobic events; education, namely, arranging and conducting educational conferences in the field of physical education, fitness and aerobic events and distribution of training materials in connection therewith; providing live and on-line continuing professional education seminars in the field of fitness; developing educational manuals for others in the field of fitness; education information, namely, providing information about education; providing live and on-line instruction in the field of fitness; providing tutorial sessions in the field(s) of fitness; providing instruction in the field of fitness; providing educational demonstrations; conducting informal on-line programs, namely, classes in the fields of fitness, and distribution of training materials in connection therewith; conducting programs in the field of fitness, namely, fitness camps; providing a continuing prerecorded audio program in the field of fitness accessible over the Internet; film production, namely, production and distribution of videos in the field of fitness; sporting and cultural events; physical education services; organization of sports competitions; rental of sport equipment's, except vehicles | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 4, 2025 | Further Decision Processed by IB | — | |
| Feb 25, 2025 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 25, 2025 | INNA | INVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE | — |
| Feb 25, 2025 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Jan 10, 2025 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 23, 2022 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Oct 26, 2021 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Feb 26, 2021 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Sep 22, 2020 | MNDA | NOTICE OF DIVIDED TRADEMARK APPLICATION MAILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2020 | PRAM | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 7 | — |
| Sep 16, 2020 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 16, 2020 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 12, 2019 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 10, 2019 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 24, 2015 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 24, 2015 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Nov 14, 2014 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 29, 2014 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 29, 2014 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 10, 2014 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 10, 2014 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 25, 2014 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2014 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 21, 2014 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 5, 2014 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 5, 2014 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 5, 2014 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 19, 2014 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 19, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 19, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 14, 2014 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 3, 2013 | RDX2 | ACTION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED MAILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2013 | RRDX | ACTION REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED COUNTED NOT MAILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 30, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 30, 2013 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 28, 2013 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 27, 2013 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 6, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 6, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 5, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 5, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 28, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 27, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 7, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 7, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 7, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 17, 2013 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 23, 2013 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2013 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 22, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 22, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 22, 2013 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 22, 2013 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 21, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 19, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 19, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 18, 2013 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Mar 15, 2013 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |