USPTO serial 79975646
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John L. Cordani
John L. Cordani Robinson & Cole LLP280 Trumbull StreetHartford, CT 06103UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | Aerated fruit juices; Aerated juices, namely, fruit juices; Aerated mineral waters; Aerated water; Alcohol free beverages, namely, non-alcoholic water-based beverages; Beverages containing vitamins, namely, drinking water; Non-alcoholic beverages, namely, water-based beverages; Preparations for making beverages, namely, powders used in the preparation of fruit-based beverages; Whey beverages; Carbonated non-alcoholic drinks; Carbonated soft drinks; Carbonated water; Concentrates for use in the preparation of soft drinks; Drinking mineral water; Drinking spring water; Drinking water; Drinking water with vitamins; Drinking waters; Flavored mineral water; Flavored waters; Flavoured beers; Non-alcoholic, flavoured carbonated beverages; Flavoured mineral water; Flavoured waters; Fruit juice for use as beverages; Fruit juices; Fruit nectars; Fruit nectars, nonalcoholic; Fruit nectars, non-alcoholic; Fruit smoothies; Fruit squashes; Fruit-based beverages; Fruit-flavored soft drinks; Fruit-flavoured beverages; Non-alcoholic, functional water-based beverages; Isotonic beverages; Low calorie soft drinks; Powders used in the preparation of soft drinks; Protein-enriched sports beverages; Quinine water; Soda pops; Soda water; Soft drinks; Soft drinks flavored with tea; Soft drinks for energy supply; Sparkling water; Sports drinks; Sports drinks containing electrolytes; Spring water; Syrups for making fruit-flavored drinks; Syrups for making non-alcoholic beverages; Syrups for making soft drinks; Syrups for making whey-based beverages; Syrups used in the preparation of soft drinks; Table water; Table waters; Tomato juice; Tonic water; Vitamin enriched sparkling water; Vitamin fortified non-alcoholic beverages, namely, sports drinks enhanced with vitamins; Water beverages; Water beverages enhanced with minerals; Water, namely, water beverages | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 14, 2023 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 14, 2023 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 14, 2022 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Sep 14, 2022 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Sep 14, 2022 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Aug 10, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 8, 2022 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 8, 2022 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 3, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 20, 2022 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 20, 2022 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 5, 2022 | MNDA | NOTICE OF DIVIDED TRADEMARK APPLICATION MAILED | — |
| Jul 1, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 1, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 1, 2022 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 29, 2022 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 27, 2022 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| May 17, 2022 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| May 17, 2022 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 17, 2022 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Feb 17, 2022 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 17, 2022 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 25, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 25, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 25, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 12, 2021 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Oct 12, 2021 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 12, 2021 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 12, 2021 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 12, 2021 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| May 23, 2021 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 27, 2021 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 27, 2021 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Apr 24, 2021 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Apr 23, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 26, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 9, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 23, 2021 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 19, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 18, 2021 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |