USPTO serial 79975684
PETRONIX DEFENDERS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HACK, ANDREA R
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PETRONIX DEFENDERS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | Games, namely, dice games; plush toys; controllers for game consoles; balls for games; tables for games; playing cards or board games; ice or roller skates; toy scooters; skateboards; sailboards or surf boards; rackets; snowshoes; skis; toy models; dolls; molded plastic toy figurines; teddy bears; radio-controlled toy vehicles; toys for pets; dice games; chess games; checkers being games; dominoes; apparatus for games, namely, targets and darts for playing darts; electronic games, including audiovisual games, namely, video game consoles and audio and visual headsets for use in playing video games; parlor games; board games; electronic video game machines; apparatus for games adapted for use with television receivers only, namely, joysticks for video games; games on mobile and fixed communication networks, namely, downloadable computer programs; costume masks | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 7, 2024 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 29, 2024 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 29, 2024 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 28, 2023 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Aug 28, 2023 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Aug 28, 2023 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 4, 2023 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 28, 2023 | MNDA | NOTICE OF DIVIDED TRADEMARK APPLICATION MAILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2023 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 22, 2023 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 30, 2022 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 30, 2022 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 22, 2022 | LIMN | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Nov 27, 2022 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 26, 2022 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Nov 3, 2022 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 3, 2022 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jul 27, 2022 | LIME | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED AND ENTERED | — |
| Jul 25, 2022 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 6, 2022 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 30, 2022 | OPNS | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 30, 2022 | OPNC | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED | — |
| Jun 29, 2022 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 31, 2022 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 31, 2022 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 11, 2022 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 1, 2022 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Apr 28, 2022 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 28, 2022 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 28, 2022 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2022 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2022 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 26, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 26, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 26, 2022 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 11, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 11, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 11, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 7, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 7, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 7, 2022 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 11, 2021 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 24, 2021 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 24, 2021 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Aug 10, 2021 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 10, 2021 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 6, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 6, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 5, 2021 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |