Drawing for DYAD

USPTO serial 79975767

DYAD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 762
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
NUNLEY, CHRISTOPHER MICHAEL
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DYAD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MATTHEW J. SMITH

MATTHEW J. SMITH POLSINELLI PCPO BOX 140310KANSAS CITY, MO 64114-0310UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Downloadable and recorded computer software for database management, operation and coordination in the medical and pharmaceutical fields; downloadable and recorded computer platform software for database management, operation and coordination in the medical and pharmaceutical fields; downloadable and recorded computer database software for database management, operation and coordination in the medical and pharmaceutical fields; downloadable and recorded computer software for data analysis and reporting for use in the medical and pharmaceutical fields; downloadable and recorded application software for mobile phones for database management, operation and coordination; downloadable and recorded computer programs for database management, operation and coordination; downloadable and recorded computer software for research and development of pharmaceuticals for medical purposes; downloadable and recorded computer databases for database management, operation and coordination in the medical and pharmaceutical fields; computer database servers for use in the medical and pharmaceutical fields; downloadable and recorded computer software for database management for use in the medical and pharmaceutical fields; downloadable and recorded computer software for creating searchable databases of information and data for use in the medical and pharmaceutical fields; downloadable and recorded online electronic publications, namely, books, magazines, journals, manuals, brochures, articles and reports featuring data, results and information for use in the medical and pharmaceutical fields; none of the aforesaid relating to food and dietary supplements; none of the aforesaid for use in connection with interpreting and analyzing medical imagesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 6, 2024EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Apr 26, 2024EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Feb 15, 2024EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Feb 15, 2024EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Feb 13, 2024MNDANOTICE OF DIVIDED TRADEMARK APPLICATION MAILED—
Feb 9, 2024DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Feb 5, 2024GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Feb 5, 2024GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Feb 5, 2024CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Feb 5, 2024AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jan 4, 2024TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 4, 2024CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 4, 2024ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 9, 2023DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Aug 9, 2023EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Aug 9, 2023JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Aug 9, 2023EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Aug 8, 2023ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jul 31, 2023OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 12, 2023OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jul 12, 2023OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 9, 2023GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Feb 9, 2023GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 9, 2023CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 9, 2022TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 8, 2022CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 8, 2022TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 30, 2022NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jun 28, 2022RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 9, 2022RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jun 9, 2022RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
May 6, 2022RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
May 5, 2022CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 3, 2022DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 15, 2022MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Feb 11, 2022NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 10, 2022REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance