Drawing for ALLGAIER

USPTO serial 79975956

ALLGAIER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 7797346Status 739Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Mar 26, 2019
Examiner
COLLOPY, DIANE PATRICIA
Law office
Historical data usage

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with ALLGAIER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Christopher M. Turk

Christopher M. Turk The Belles Group, P.C.1800 John F. Kennedy BoulevardSuite 1010PHILADELPHIA, PA 19103

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007screening machines for bulk materials; screening plants, namely, combinations of machines for the screening of bulk materials; separating machines, separating machines for bulk materials; sorting machines for sorting of bulk materials of different colors, chemical structures, substances, inner materials, and for sorting particles; sorting plants, namely, combinations of machines for the sorting of bulk materials of different colors, chemical structures, substances, inner materials and for sorting particles; conveyor plants, namely, combinations of machines for moving bulk materials comprising multiple conveyor belts; conveyor belts; cutting machines; granulators for granulating food, chemical products, pharmaceuticals products, fertilizers, or pigments; coating machines for coating food, chemical products, pharmaceuticals products, fertilizers, or pigments; press tools, namely, power operated tools used in hydraulic, pneumatic, and mechanical presses to product sheet metal components [ ; machine parts, namely, conveyor belts and conveyor belts with opto-electronic sorting functions, motors, pneumatic nozzles for separation, vibrating motors, unbalanced motors, screening meshes, sieve decks, vibrating conveyors; replacement structural parts for all of the aforesaid goods; industrial plants, namely, combinations of industrial machines for treatment of bulk materials by granulation, agglomeration, coating, or spraying ]ACTIVE—
011Industrial apparatus for the treatment of bulk materials using heat; industrial apparatus for the treatment of bulk materials using cooling; industrial machines for drying used in the treatment of bulk materials; industrial plants, namely, combinations of machines for the treatment of bulk materials by heat or cold; industrial drying plants, namely, combinations of drying machines for the treatment of bulk materialsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 27, 2026INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Aug 26, 2025NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Aug 26, 2025C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Aug 22, 2025ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Aug 21, 2025PRANPOST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED NO RESPONSE REQUIRED—
May 9, 2025DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
May 8, 2025APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Nov 14, 2024DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Nov 14, 2024LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB—
Nov 13, 2024ERTRTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE REGISTRATION—
Mar 26, 2024REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Oct 27, 2023LIMNLIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
Aug 26, 2023RHRDRESTRICTION OF HOLDER'S RIGHT OF DISPOSAL RECEIVED—
Aug 16, 2019FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 30, 2019FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jul 30, 2019FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jun 26, 2019FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 26, 2019R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jan 29, 2019LIMNLIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
Jan 24, 2019LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jan 8, 2019NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jan 8, 2019PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 19, 2018NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Nov 19, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 16, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 16, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 16, 2018ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Oct 18, 2018GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Oct 18, 2018GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 18, 2018CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 27, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 27, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 27, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 4, 2018RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 18, 2018RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jul 18, 2018RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jul 7, 2018RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jul 7, 2018MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jul 6, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 3, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 3, 2018NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 28, 2018REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance