USPTO serial 79975956
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Christopher M. Turk
Christopher M. Turk The Belles Group, P.C.1800 John F. Kennedy BoulevardSuite 1010PHILADELPHIA, PA 19103| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | screening machines for bulk materials; screening plants, namely, combinations of machines for the screening of bulk materials; separating machines, separating machines for bulk materials; sorting machines for sorting of bulk materials of different colors, chemical structures, substances, inner materials, and for sorting particles; sorting plants, namely, combinations of machines for the sorting of bulk materials of different colors, chemical structures, substances, inner materials and for sorting particles; conveyor plants, namely, combinations of machines for moving bulk materials comprising multiple conveyor belts; conveyor belts; cutting machines; granulators for granulating food, chemical products, pharmaceuticals products, fertilizers, or pigments; coating machines for coating food, chemical products, pharmaceuticals products, fertilizers, or pigments; press tools, namely, power operated tools used in hydraulic, pneumatic, and mechanical presses to product sheet metal components [ ; machine parts, namely, conveyor belts and conveyor belts with opto-electronic sorting functions, motors, pneumatic nozzles for separation, vibrating motors, unbalanced motors, screening meshes, sieve decks, vibrating conveyors; replacement structural parts for all of the aforesaid goods; industrial plants, namely, combinations of industrial machines for treatment of bulk materials by granulation, agglomeration, coating, or spraying ] | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | Industrial apparatus for the treatment of bulk materials using heat; industrial apparatus for the treatment of bulk materials using cooling; industrial machines for drying used in the treatment of bulk materials; industrial plants, namely, combinations of machines for the treatment of bulk materials by heat or cold; industrial drying plants, namely, combinations of drying machines for the treatment of bulk materials | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 27, 2026 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Aug 26, 2025 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2025 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Aug 22, 2025 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 21, 2025 | PRAN | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED NO RESPONSE REQUIRED | — |
| May 9, 2025 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 8, 2025 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 14, 2024 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 14, 2024 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Nov 13, 2024 | ERTR | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE REGISTRATION | — |
| Mar 26, 2024 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2023 | LIMN | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Aug 26, 2023 | RHRD | RESTRICTION OF HOLDER'S RIGHT OF DISPOSAL RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 16, 2019 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 30, 2019 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 30, 2019 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jun 26, 2019 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 26, 2019 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 29, 2019 | LIMN | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Jan 24, 2019 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jan 8, 2019 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2019 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 19, 2018 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 19, 2018 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 16, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 16, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 16, 2018 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 18, 2018 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2018 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 18, 2018 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 27, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 27, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 27, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 4, 2018 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 18, 2018 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 18, 2018 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jul 7, 2018 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jul 7, 2018 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 3, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 3, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 28, 2018 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |