Drawing for OLMSTED NATURAL FRONTIER

USPTO serial 85000035

OLMSTED NATURAL FRONTIER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BELENKER, ESTHER
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with OLMSTED NATURAL FRONTIER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

W. THOMAS TIMMONS

1320 PRUDENTIAL DRIVESUITE 208DALLAS, TX 75235-4117

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Natural area development and preservation services, namely, monitoring, testing and analyzing ecological success in the field of environmentally sensitive habitat conservation and preservation of natural topographic features, vegetation and wildlife; landscape architectural services including designating historical landmarks in urban central cities and suburbs related to natural features for preservationACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 23, 2012MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 23, 2012ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 20, 2011NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 25, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Oct 25, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 21, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 15, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 7, 2011XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Sep 7, 2011GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 7, 2011GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 7, 2011CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Feb 1, 2011GEANNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
Feb 1, 2011GEAPEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
Feb 1, 2011CPEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED—
Dec 21, 2010ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Dec 21, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 21, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 29, 2010MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 27, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 27, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 27, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 27, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 27, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 27, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 26, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 14, 2010TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 1, 2010TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 31, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 31, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance