CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for SHOUTVU

USPTO serial 85000231

SHOUTVU

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KING, CHRISTINA B
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SHOUTVU?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Donald A. Schurr

Donald A. Schurr Marshall & Melhorn, LLCFour SeaGate, Eighth FloorToledo, OH 43566UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software, namely, software development tools for the creation of mobile internet applications and client interfaces; Downloadable audio files, multimedia files, text files, e-mails, written documents, audio material, video material and games featuring information in the form of downloadable short educational/training communications in the field of human resource development for the promotion of employee retention, career growth and increased productivity for employees and employersACTIVE—
035Video production services in the field of employment recruitingACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 21, 2012MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 21, 2012ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 17, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Dec 16, 2011EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 16, 2011AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Dec 7, 2011TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Dec 7, 2011PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Dec 7, 2011PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Nov 21, 2011MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 21, 2011ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 19, 2011EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Apr 19, 2011NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 22, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Feb 22, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 18, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 18, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 21, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 21, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 21, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 21, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 29, 2010GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jun 29, 2010GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jun 29, 2010CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jun 27, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 1, 2010MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Mar 31, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 31, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance