USPTO serial 85000419
PRODIGI VU UNIFIED
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CORWIN, CHARLOTTE K
- Law office
- LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PRODIGI VU UNIFIED?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Moncton, New Brunswick, CA
SPIELO INTERNATIONAL CANADA ULC
MONCTON, NEW BRUNSWICK, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Colleen Caissie-Dupuis
COLLEEN CAISSIE-DUPUIS SPIELO MANUFACTURING ULC328 URQUHART AVENUEMONCTON, NEW BRUNSWICK, E1H2R6CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | (Based on Intent to Use) Reconfigurable casino and lottery gaming equipment, namely, gaming machines and operational computer game software therefor (Based on 44(d) Priority Application) Reconfigurable casino and lottery gaming equipment, namely, gaming machines and operational computer game software therefor | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 26, 2012 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 26, 2012 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 29, 2011 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2011 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 8, 2011 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 13, 2011 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Feb 4, 2011 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 4, 2011 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 4, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 12, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 12, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 11, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 17, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 25, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 25, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 25, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 23, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 7, 2010 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 1, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |