Drawing for Serial No. 85000636

USPTO serial 85000636

Serial No. 85000636

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DEFORD, JEFFREY S
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with Serial No. 85000636?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Charles A. Crehore

Charles A. Crehore Ulmer & Berne LLP1660 West 2nd Street, Suite 1100Cleveland, OH 44113-1448UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Dietary supplements; dietary fiber supplements; pre-packaged reduced calorie nutritional shakes and energy bars for use as a meal substituteACTIVE—
029Pre-packaged dietary snacks, namely, protein-based nutrient dense snack bars not for health or medical purposes; pre-packaged reduced calorie foods, namely, jellies not for health or medical purposes; pre-packaged reduced calorie meals consisting primarily of meat, poultry or fish not for health or medical purposes; pre-packaged dietary powdered soup mixes not for health or medical purposes; and pre-packaged dietary processed fruit-based food bars, not for health or medical purposesACTIVE—
030Pre-packaged dietary foods, namely, salad dressings not for health or medical purposes; pre-packaged dietary powdered dessert mixes, namely, dessert mousse; pre-packaged dietary snacks, namely, lollipops and wrapped candies not for health or medical purposes; pre-packaged dietary beverages, namely, shakes, not for health or medical purposesACTIVE—
035Retail store services featuring pre-packaged dietary foods, snacks and beverages, dietary supplements, and prepared reduced calorie foodsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 17, 2013MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 17, 2013ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 21, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 20, 2012EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Nov 15, 2012EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Nov 15, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 1, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 31, 2012EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Aug 28, 2012AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Aug 20, 2012NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Aug 20, 2012TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Aug 20, 2012PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Aug 20, 2012PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jun 18, 2012MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 18, 2012ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 15, 2012EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 15, 2011NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 20, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Sep 20, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 25, 2011PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Jul 12, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 11, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 5, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 5, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 5, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 5, 2011PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jul 5, 2011PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
May 6, 2011MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 6, 2011ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 27, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 27, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 27, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 1, 2010ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Aug 15, 2010PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Aug 5, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 5, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 22, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 7, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 7, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 7, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 6, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 6, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 6, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 28, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 5, 2010TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 2, 2010MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Apr 1, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 1, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance