USPTO serial 85000641
NATIONAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP HALL OF FAME & MUSEUM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CLARK, ROBERT C
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NATIONAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP HALL OF FAME & MUSEUM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
VINCENT M. AMBERLY
VINCENT M AMBERLY AMBERLY LAW307 E MARKET STREETSUITE 202LEESBURG, VA 20176Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Continuing public service programs in the field of information about entrepreneurs produced and distributed over television, satellite, film, audio, video, internet, and 3-D virtual reality media; Education services, namely, mentoring in the field of understanding, building, operating, and expanding a business; Educational services, namely, conducting programs in the field of understanding, building, operating, and expanding a business; Educational services, namely, conducting providing live and on-line classes, seminars, workshops and workshops in the field of building, operating, and expanding a business; Educational services, namely, providing a continuing prerecorded audio program in the field of information about entrepreneurs accessible over the internet; Educational services, namely, providing displays and exhibits in the field of understanding, building, operating, and expanding a business; Educational services, namely, providing on-line classes, seminars, workshops and workshops in the field of understanding, building, operating, and expanding a business; Educational services, namely, providing providing live and on-line classes, seminars, workshops and workshops in the fields of understanding, building, operating, and expanding a business; Entertainment services, namely, the provision of continuing programs, segments and shows featuring information about entrepreneurs delivered by the internet; Entertainment, namely, a continuing show and information about entrepreneurs show broadcast over the internet; Museum services; Museums | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 16, 2012 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 26, 2012 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 26, 2012 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 10, 2012 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Sep 19, 2011 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 19, 2011 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Mar 18, 2011 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2011 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 18, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 1, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 1, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 1, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 1, 2011 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 1, 2011 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 24, 2011 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 24, 2011 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 28, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 28, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 28, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 27, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 2, 2010 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Apr 1, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 1, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |