USPTO serial 85000751
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jordan A. LaVine
JORDAN A LAVINE FLASTER/GREENBERG PC1600 JFK BLVD FL 2PHILADELPHIA, PA 19103-2808UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable reports and electronic publications in the nature of newsletters, magazines, guides, brochures, manuals and prospectuses featuring information concerning the environmental, economic and social impact of businesses and private equity funds | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | Printed reports and publications in the nature of newsletters, magazines, guides, brochures, manuals and prospectuses featuring information concerning the environmental, economic and social impact of businesses and private equity funds; printed surveys and assessments in the field of environmental, economic and social impact of businesses and private equity funds | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Rating services, namely, rating the goods and services of companies based upon their environmental, economic and social impact for purposes of making purchasing decisions; rating services, namely, rating the goods and services of private equity funds companies based upon their environmental and social impact for purposes of making purchasing decisions; providing a directory of companies and private equity funds to enable investors to evaluate businesses and private equity funds based upon their environmental, economic and social impact; conducting business research and surveys; business information services and business appraisals featuring assessments regarding ethical standards, environmental and social impact, workplace practices, and corporate governance; business information services, namely, company analysis and profile information; business research; compilation of business information into computer databases; promoting awareness of the environmental, economic and social impact of companies and private equity funds; business consulting services in the field of measuring the environmental, economic and social impact of businesses for purposes of making purchasing decisions; business consulting services in the field of measuring the environmental and social impact of private equity funds for purposes of making purchasing decisions; special event planning for business purposes, namely, organizing, planning, convening, and managing events in the field of socially responsible business practices; providing a website featuring information concerning the environmental, economic and social impact of the goods and services of businesses for purposes of making purchasing decisions; providing a website featuring information concerning the environmental and social impact of the goods and services of private equity funds for purposes of making purchasing decisions | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | Rating services, namely, rating private equity funds based upon their economic impact; providing a website featuring information concerning the economic impact of equity funds; financial consulting services in the field of measuring the economic impact of private equity funds | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 6, 2016 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 6, 2016 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 6, 2016 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 28, 2016 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Feb 29, 2016 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 29, 2016 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 29, 2016 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Aug 28, 2015 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2015 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 28, 2015 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 12, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 11, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 11, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 11, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 11, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 11, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 23, 2015 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 14, 2014 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 13, 2014 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 9, 2013 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 9, 2013 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 26, 2012 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jul 9, 2012 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 7, 2012 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 7, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 5, 2011 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 4, 2011 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2011 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 29, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 29, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 29, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 29, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 29, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 29, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 28, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 6, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 1, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |