Drawing for WEBCHART EHR NOW

USPTO serial 85000803

WEBCHART EHR NOW

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FRAZIER, TAMARA G
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WEBCHART EHR NOW?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael E. Wever

MICHAEL E WEVER BARNES & THORNBURG LLP600 ONE SUMMIT SQFORT WAYNE, IN 46802UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Computer services, namely, acting as an application service provider ("ASP") or a provider of software as a service ("SAAS") in the health care field to host computer application software for the collection, editing, organizing, modifying, transmission, storage and sharing of data and information relating to health care services; ASP or SAAS featuring software in the field of populating, accessing, managing, and analyzing electronic health records or electronic medical records; ASP or SAAS featuring software in the field of billing and management of health care services; ASP or SAAS featuring software in the field of managing and accessing medical documents; ASP or SAAS featuring software in the field of managing, accessing and archival of electronic medical images; ASP or SAAS featuring software in the field of managing dictations and transcriptionsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 4, 2012MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Jun 4, 2012ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
May 18, 2012EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Mar 12, 2012GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Mar 12, 2012GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Mar 12, 2012CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Mar 8, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 8, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 8, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 17, 2012ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Feb 17, 2012ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Feb 17, 2012EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Feb 17, 2012JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Feb 17, 2012EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Feb 9, 2012TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 18, 2011GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Aug 18, 2011GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 18, 2011CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 20, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 20, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 20, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 21, 2011AAUANOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED—
Jan 20, 2011GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 20, 2011GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 20, 2011IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED—
Jan 20, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 29, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 29, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 29, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 22, 2010AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Dec 22, 2010IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Dec 21, 2010EAAUTEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED—
Jun 29, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 29, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 29, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 27, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 2, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 1, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance