Drawing for FEDCON CONSULTING

USPTO serial 85000897

FEDCON CONSULTING

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SHARMA, NAPOLEON
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FEDCON CONSULTING?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Joseph M. Konieczny, Sr.

JOSEPH M KONIECZNY SR RYDER LU MAZZEO & KONIECZNY LLCPO BOX 670PLYMOUTH MEETING, PA 19462-1422UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Providing business advice and business assistance to commercial entities relating to the establishment and maintenance of business and contractual relationships with federal, state and local governmentsACTIVEJan 1, 2010

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 29, 2011MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Nov 21, 2011ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Nov 21, 2011EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Nov 21, 2011EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Oct 4, 2011EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Jul 21, 2011EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jul 21, 2011EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jan 21, 2011GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jan 21, 2011GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 21, 2011CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 28, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 27, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 27, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 27, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 27, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 27, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 27, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 3, 2010MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Apr 2, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance