Drawing for INTERNATIONAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP HALL OF FAME & MUSEUM

USPTO serial 85001015

INTERNATIONAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP HALL OF FAME & MUSEUM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CLARK, ROBERT C
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with INTERNATIONAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP HALL OF FAME & MUSEUM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

VINCENT M. AMBERLY

VINCENT M AMBERLY AMBERLY LAW10805 MAIN ST STE 700FAIRFAX, VA 22030-4729UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Education services, namely, mentoring in the field of understanding, building, operating, and expanding a business; Education services, namely, providing live and on-line classes, seminars, and workshops in the field of understanding, building, operating, and expanding a business; Education services, namely, providing on-line classes, seminars, and workshops in the field of understanding, building, operating, and expanding a business; Education services, namely, providing classes, seminars, and workshops in the field of understanding, building, operating, and expanding a business; Educational services, namely, conducting programs in the field of understanding, building, operating, and expanding a business; Educational services, namely, conducting classes, seminars, and workshops in the field of understanding, building, operating, and expanding a business; Educational services, namely, providing displays and exhibits in the field of understanding, building, operating, and expanding a business; Entertainment services, namely, the provision of continuing programs, segments and shows featuring information about entrepreneurs delivered by the internet; Entertainment, namely, a continuing programs, segments and show broadcast over the internet; Museum services; MuseumsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 3, 2012MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
May 1, 2012EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Mar 13, 2012ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Mar 13, 2012EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Sep 19, 2011EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Sep 19, 2011EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Mar 18, 2011GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Mar 18, 2011GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 18, 2011CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 1, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 1, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 1, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 1, 2011PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Mar 1, 2011PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jan 24, 2011MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 24, 2011ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 28, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 28, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 28, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 27, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 3, 2010MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Apr 2, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 1, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance