USPTO serial 85001161
OTOY OPEN STREAMING INITIATIVE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DELANEY, ZHALEH SYBIL
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with OTOY OPEN STREAMING INITIATIVE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Sherman Oaks, CA
Los Angeles, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lawrence E. Apolzon
LAWRENCE E. APOLZON FROSS ZELNICK LEHRMAN & ZISSU, P.C.866 UNITED NATIONS PLZNEW YORK, NY 10017-1822UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software and downloadable computer software that provides vendor agnostic open standards for cloud-based delivery of games, applications and media by content creators, internet service providers and hardware manufacturers for purposes of delivering content to consumers on internet-enabled devices; computer software for streaming and storing cloud based games, applications and media from a dedicated hosting server; downloadable computer software for viewing, displaying, caching, sandboxing in the nature of isolating the operation of software in a separate secure environment and interacting with streamed applications, games and media delivered from a remote process or server within a web browser, desktop window or through a windowless process that allows the streamed content to operate as within a viewport of another application; downloadable computer software for extending the aforementioned software with functionality that allows it to further transmit a local application, portion of the desktop, or local display surface to a remote peer, and act as ad-hoc server in place of a central server | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Electronic transmission and streaming of digital entertainment media content, including computer games and computer game applications, via global and local computer networks, to internet-enabled devices, internet service providers, and hardware manufacturers | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Application service provider (ASP) featuring software and hosting software of others for the delivery of games, applications for content viewing, content creation, 2D or 3D design, web browsing, productivity, office software suites, text editing, programming, PC Utility tools and media, media for presenting video, audio, 3D, subtitles, and menus, and for the delivery of extra material in the nature of multimedia content included in DVDs to enhance their value such as interviews, promotional materials, screenplays, and deleted scenes for use by content creators, internet services providers and hardware manufacturers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Julian M. Urbach
- Other trademarks owned by Julian M. Urbach
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named OTOY OPEN STREAMING INITIATIVE
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 16, 2014 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 16, 2014 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 20, 2013 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Nov 20, 2013 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 19, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2013 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 11, 2013 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Nov 11, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 16, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| May 15, 2013 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 9, 2013 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 9, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 28, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Aug 27, 2012 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 22, 2012 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 8, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| May 7, 2012 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 3, 2012 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 12, 2012 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 12, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 10, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2011 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 8, 2011 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 10, 2011 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 15, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 23, 2011 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 4, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 4, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 10, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 7, 2011 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 7, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 28, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 28, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 28, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 29, 2010 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jun 29, 2010 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jun 27, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 3, 2010 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Apr 2, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 1, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |