USPTO serial 85001985
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Bergisch Gladbach, DE
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark D. Schneider
MARK D SCHNEIDER GIFFORD KRASS SPRINKLE ANDERSON & CITKOWSKI PC2701 TROY CENTER DRIVE SUITE 330PO BOX 7021TROY, MI 48007-7021| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Metal fastening anchors for securing lighting apparatus; spacer brackets of metal for use with lighting apparatus | ACTIVE | — |
| 007 | Mechanical winders and machines for forming coils of rope used in connection with lighting apparatus | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Electric connectors, namely, L-connectors, T-connectors and cross connectors, connectors, and electric couplings, all for use with lighting apparatus | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | Lighting apparatus, namely, lighting fixtures, lighting tracks, track lighting, spots for lighting tracks, floodlights for lighting tracks, luminaries with LED light machines for track lighting; Lamps, namely, table lamps, floor lamps, wall lamps, ceiling lamps for indoor use; Special-purpose lamps, namely, object and/or picture lights; Lighting devices for showcases, namely, contact rails for lights, including being picture rails; Accessories for the aforesaid goods, namely, light diffusers being structural parts of lighting fixtures; Accessories for the aforesaid goods, in particular glass elements with lights, namely, LED and OLED light machines, LED and OLED luminaries, LED and OLED engines | ACTIVE | — |
| 020 | Non-metal fastening anchors for securing lighting apparatus | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 14, 2013 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Feb 13, 2013 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Feb 13, 2013 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 29, 2012 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Sep 12, 2012 | RBFT | REPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES | — |
| Aug 22, 2012 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2012 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2012 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 2, 2012 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 4, 2012 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| May 4, 2012 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| May 4, 2012 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 12, 2012 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 12, 2012 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 12, 2012 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Apr 4, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 3, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 3, 2012 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 12, 2011 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Oct 12, 2011 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 12, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 20, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 19, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 19, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 18, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 18, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 18, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 11, 2011 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Feb 28, 2011 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Feb 16, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 11, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 18, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 18, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 14, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 29, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 8, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 8, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 8, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 28, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 7, 2010 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 2, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |