Where is the live CopyMark page for USPTO serial 85002007?

The live record is at https://getcopymark.com/trademark/85002007. Use https://getcopymark.com/trademark/{serialNumber} for any 8-digit USPTO serial.

Who owns PROGRESSIVE PHYSICAL THERAPY?

According to the public USPTO record for serial number 85002007, the listed owner(s) include: UCI Medical Affiliates, Inc..

What is USPTO serial number 85002007?

Serial number 85002007 is the USPTO application identifier for the mark PROGRESSIVE PHYSICAL THERAPY. It is used to track examination, publication, and registration of this trademark.

What is the current status of PROGRESSIVE PHYSICAL THERAPY?

PROGRESSIVE PHYSICAL THERAPY (85002007) currently shows USPTO status code 603 on the public record. This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Which trademark classes cover PROGRESSIVE PHYSICAL THERAPY?

The public record lists International Classes: 044. Each class corresponds to categories of goods or services identified in the application or registration.

4.9/5

USPTO serial 85002007

PROGRESSIVE PHYSICAL THERAPY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603

Filing date: Mar 30, 2010
Status date: Feb 5, 2013
Registration date: —
Examiner: SINGLETON, RUDY
Law office: TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PROGRESSIVE PHYSICAL THERAPY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner

Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.

Trademark Monitoring

(312) 319-4460

Not the owner?

File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Start a new application

(312) 319-4460

Owner

UCI Medical Affiliates, Inc.
Columbia, SC
Other trademarks owned by UCI Medical Affiliates, Inc.

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

William Y. Klett, III

SARA C KANOS NEXSEN PRUET LLCPO DRAWER 10648GREENVILLE, SC 29603UNITED STATES

Goods and services

Class	Description	Status	First use
044	Physical therapy evaluation, identification, and management of movement dysfunction to restore, maintain, and promote optimal physical function preventing the onset, symptoms and advancement of impairments, functional limitations, and disabilities resulting from disease, disorders, conditions, or injuries, occupational therapy, industrial medicine, sports medicine, and spine stabilization services	ACTIVE	Oct 31, 1997

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Date	Code	Event	What it means
Feb 14, 2013	MAB3	ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL	—
Feb 5, 2013	ABN3	ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL	—
Feb 5, 2013	EXPT	EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED	—
Dec 19, 2012	EXFB	EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF	—
Oct 1, 2012	GEA1	NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED	—
Oct 1, 2012	GECD	ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED	—
Oct 1, 2012	CNCF	ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED	—
Sep 4, 2012	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
Sep 4, 2012	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Aug 28, 2012	TCCA	TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED	—
Aug 28, 2012	ERFR	TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED	—
Feb 28, 2012	GNS1	NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED	—
Feb 28, 2012	GNSF	SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED	—
Feb 28, 2012	CFRC	SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN	—
Feb 3, 2012	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
Feb 2, 2012	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Feb 2, 2012	TROA	TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 2, 2011	GNRN	NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 2, 2011	GNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 2, 2011	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 21, 2011	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
Jul 21, 2011	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Jul 20, 2011	ALIE	ASSIGNED TO LIE	—
Jul 8, 2011	ERFR	TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED	—
Jul 8, 2011	EXPI	EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED	—
Jul 8, 2011	JURT	JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY	—
Jul 8, 2011	EXAF	EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB	—
Jan 12, 2011	GNFN	NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED	—
Jan 12, 2011	GNFR	FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED	A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 12, 2011	CNFR	FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN	A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 21, 2010	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
Dec 21, 2010	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Dec 21, 2010	TROA	TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 28, 2010	GNRN	NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 28, 2010	GNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 28, 2010	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 27, 2010	DOCK	ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER	—
Apr 6, 2010	NWOS	NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED	—
Apr 2, 2010	NWAP	NEW APPLICATION ENTERED	—