USPTO serial 85002025
ESG ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS GROUP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PERKINS, ELLEN J
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ESG ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS GROUP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Chattanooga, TN
Chattanooga, TN
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Alejandro Menchaca
ALEJANDRO MENCHACA MCANDREWS HELD & MALLOY LTD500 W MADISON ST FL 34CHICAGO, IL 60661-4584UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Stationary refuse and recycling compactors, stationary refuse and recycling balers, refuse and recycling cart tippers, commercial and industrial cart tippers for material handling; and structural and component parts for stationary mechanized refuse compactors and balers, namely, arm assemblies and component parts thereof, arm brackets, blade assemblies and component parts thereof, blade harnesses, blade latches, blade packers, blade sweeps, ejector assemblies and component parts thereof, ejector braces, ejector rails, ejector slides, ejector tracks, hydraulic cylinders and related components, fork assemblies and component parts thereof, hoist assemblies and component parts thereof, packer assemblies and component parts thereof, packer blades, packer panels, hopper assemblies and component parts thereof, latch assemblies and component parts thereof, tailgate assemblies and component parts thereof, winch assemblies and component parts thereof, reever assemblies and component parts thereof, which structural and component parts are sold as a unit therewith | ACTIVE | — |
| 012 | Trailerized refuse equipment, namely, detachable refuse bodies and recycle bodies for mounting on a vehicle; and structural and component parts for the repair and service of such trailerized refuse and recycle equipment, namely, arm assemblies and component parts thereof, arm brackets, blade assemblies and component parts thereof, blade harnesses, blade latches, blade packers, blade sweeps, ejector assemblies and component parts thereof, ejector braces, ejector rails, ejector slides, ejector tracks, hydraulic cylinders and related components, fork assemblies and component parts thereof, hoist assemblies and component parts thereof, packer assemblies and component parts thereof, packer blades, packer panels, hopper assemblies and component parts thereof, latch assemblies and component parts thereof, tailgate assemblies and component parts thereof, which structural and component parts are sold as a unit therewith | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by The Heil Co.
- Other trademarks owned by The Heil Co.
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Similar marks named ESG ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS GROUP
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 8, 2013 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 8, 2013 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 8, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 7, 2012 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 7, 2012 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 5, 2012 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 5, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 6, 2012 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 10, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 21, 2011 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 30, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 18, 2011 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 30, 2011 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2011 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2011 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 9, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 9, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 2, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 1, 2011 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 1, 2011 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 1, 2011 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 1, 2011 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Mar 3, 2011 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Mar 3, 2011 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 3, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 29, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 29, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 29, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 10, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 1, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 1, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 1, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 28, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 7, 2010 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 2, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |