Drawing for FETISHDATING.COM

USPTO serial 85002156

FETISHDATING.COM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
THOMAS, JULIE
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FETISHDATING.COM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John J. O'Malley

JOHN J OMALLEY VOLPE AND KOENIG PC30 S 17TH STPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103-4009UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
045Dating servicesACTIVEJun 1, 2010

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 16, 2014MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Apr 14, 2014ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Apr 14, 2014EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Feb 26, 2014EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Feb 6, 2013ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Jan 2, 2013GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jan 2, 2013GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jan 2, 2013CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Nov 29, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 29, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 28, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 26, 2012ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Nov 26, 2012TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 26, 2012EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Nov 26, 2012JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Nov 26, 2012EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
May 25, 2012GNS1NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED—
May 25, 2012GNSFSUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED—
May 25, 2012CFRCSUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN—
Apr 13, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 12, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 12, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 12, 2011GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 12, 2011GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 12, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 18, 2011AAUANOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED—
Aug 17, 2011IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED—
Jul 27, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 27, 2011AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jul 27, 2011IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Jul 26, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 26, 2011ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jul 26, 2011EAAUTEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED—
Jan 26, 2011GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jan 26, 2011GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 26, 2011CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 30, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 30, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 30, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 30, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 30, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 30, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 28, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 29, 2010CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Apr 29, 2010COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Apr 7, 2010MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Apr 6, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 2, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance