Drawing for REWARDS ADVANTAGE CHECKING

USPTO serial 85003495

REWARDS ADVANTAGE CHECKING

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HAN, DAWN L
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with REWARDS ADVANTAGE CHECKING?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Robert S. Beiser

ROBERT S BEISER VEDDER PRICE PC222 N LASALLE ST STE 2500CHICAGO, IL 60601-1104UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036Banking services, namely, checking account servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 7, 2011MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Nov 14, 2011ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Nov 14, 2011EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Sep 27, 2011EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Jul 14, 2011GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jul 14, 2011GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jul 14, 2011CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Jun 27, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 27, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 22, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 14, 2011ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jun 14, 2011EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jun 14, 2011JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jun 14, 2011EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Dec 14, 2010GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Dec 14, 2010GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 14, 2010CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 22, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 22, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 22, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 17, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 17, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 17, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 17, 2010ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Aug 6, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 13, 2010XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jul 13, 2010GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 13, 2010GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 13, 2010CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jul 8, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 8, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 8, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 29, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 8, 2010TAEATEAS AMENDMENT ENTERED BEFORE ATTORNEY ASSIGNED—
Apr 8, 2010PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Apr 6, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 3, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance