Drawing for WHAT ARE THEY WEARING

USPTO serial 85003702

WHAT ARE THEY WEARING

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FARRELL, ANNE M
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with WHAT ARE THEY WEARING?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Brett A. Garner, Esq.

BRETT A. GARNER, ESQ. MICHELMAN & ROBINSON, LLP15760 VENTURA BLVD FL 5ENCINO, CA 91436-3011UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Advertising and marketing services; advertising and marketing services related to the provision of news and information; provision of space on web sites for advertising goods and services; business management; business administration; providing a web site where users can post recommendations on consumer goods; providing an on-line computer database in the field of locating products and describing products; arrangement of trading transactions on electronic communications networks, namely, providing a web site that links to the retail web sites of others and that collects and tracks ecommerce transactions between online web sites and retail web sites of othersACTIVEMar 25, 2010
041Entertainment services, namely, providing a web site featuring photographic, audio, video, and prose presentations featuring celebrity news and promotional material; providing an Internet news portal featuring links to news stories and articles in the field of current events, video, mobile applications, web applications, and traditional online content, namely e-newsletters and blogsACTIVEMar 25, 2010

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 10, 2011MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 9, 2011ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 30, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 29, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 29, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 7, 2010MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Apr 6, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 3, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance