USPTO serial 85004022
LINCOLN CHROME
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LOWRY, LEIGH A
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LINCOLN CHROME?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John C. Miles
JOHN C MILES CLINE WILLIAMS LAW FIRM233 S 13TH ST STE 1900LINCOLN, NE 68508-2000UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 040 | Manufacture of chrome exhaust products, namely, bumpers, flatstock, and lighting components to the order and/or specification of others | ABANDONED | Aug 1, 2009 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 12, 2015 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 4, 2013 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Dec 4, 2013 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Dec 4, 2013 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 4, 2013 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 16, 2011 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 16, 2010 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 16, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 16, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 13, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 13, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 30, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 30, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 30, 2010 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2010 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 16, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 16, 2010 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2010 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 25, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 25, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 25, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 13, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 13, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 13, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 30, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 8, 2010 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 5, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |